铃蟾肽导的豚鼠肠系膜下神经节非胆碱能迟慢兴奋性突触后电位

孔德虎*,  王刚, 王宏梅, 柯道平, 胡金兰, 祝延,  黄振信

安徽医科大学生理学教研室神经生理实验室,  合肥 230032

 

摘要: 应用细胞内记录技术, 对铃蟾肽(bombesin, BOM)在豚鼠离体肠系膜下神经节(inferior mesenteric ganglion,  IMG)非胆碱能兴奋性突触传递中的作用进行了研究。重复电刺激突触前结肠神经, 有74.3% (52/70) IMG细胞可诱发迟慢兴奋性突触后电位(ls-EPSP)。在可引出ls-EPSP 的细胞中, 22% (4/18)细胞同时对BOM和SP敏感。用BOM持续灌流IMG, 可明显抑制对BOM敏感细胞的ls-EPSP, 对BOM不敏感细胞的ls-EPSP则无影响, 且BOM受体与SP受体间无交叉脱敏。BOM受体阻断剂tyr4[D-phe12]bombesin能明显可逆性地抑制BOM敏感细胞的ls-EPSP和去极化, 但对BOM不敏感细胞则无影响。研究结果提示, BOM可能是导豚鼠IMG 细胞ls-EPSP的一种递质。

 

关键词: 铃蟾肽; P物质; 迟慢兴奋性突触后电位; 肠系膜下神经节; 豚鼠

 

中图分类号: Q421

 

Bombesin-mediated non-cholinergic late slow excitatory postsynaptic potentials in  guinea pig inferior mesenteric ganglion in vitro

KONG De-Hu*, WANG Gang, WANG Hong-Mei, KE Dao-Ping, HU Jin-Lan, ZHU Yan, HUANG Zhen-Xin

Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Department of Physiology,  Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032

 

Abstract: The effect of bombesin (BOM) on non-cholinergic excitatory synaptic transmission of the guinea pig inferior mesenteric ganglion (IMG) was investigated by intracellular recording.  Repetitive stimulation of the colon nerves (1 ms, 25 Hz,  4 s) elicited a burst of action potentials,  which was followed by a long-lasting depolarization in 74.3% (52/70) of the IMG neurons.  The depolarization was not blocked by nicotinic (d-tubocurarine, 100 μmol/L) and muscarinic (atropine, 1 μmol/L) antagonists,  but was eliminated in a low Ca2+/high Mg2+ Krebs solution,  indicating that the depolarization was due to the release of  non-cholinergic transmitters. Superfusing the ganglia with BOM (10  μmol/L,  1 min) induced a slow depolarization in 66.5% (109/164) neurons tested. The BOM response was not appreciably changed in  low Ca2+/high Mg2+ Krebs solution (n=6,  P>0.05),  suggesting that BOM depolarized the neurons by acting directly on the postsynaptic membrane rather than via a release of other endogenous depolarizing substances. In a total of 102 cells that exhibited  late slow excitatory postsynaptic potential (ls-EPSP),  superfusion of the ganglia with BOM produced a membrane depolarization in 82 neurons (80%),  while the remaining 20 cells (20%) exhibited no response to BOM.  In 18 neurons with ls-EPSP,  four (22%) neurons were sensitive to both BOM and SP; six (33%) and five (28%) neurons were only sensitive to BOM and SP,  respectively. The remaining 3 (17%) neurons were insensitive to both BOM and SP. Membrane resistance (Rm) had no apparent change in 47.3%,  59.5 %  of the neurons tested during the ls-EPSP (n=55) and  BOM depolarization (n=84),  respectively,  but had a marked decrease in 38.2%,  27.4%,  and a marked increase in the remaining  14.5%,  13.1% of the neurons.    However,  when the Rm change accompanying ls-EPSP was compared with that accompanying BOM depolarization (n=20) in the same neuron,  the changes in Rm were always parallel.  Moreover,  ls-EPSP (n=6)  and BOM depolarization (n=8) were all augmented by conditioning hyperpolarization.  The extrapolated values of  the reversal potentials of ls-EPSP and  BOM depolarization were -46.0±8.0 and  -50.0±7.0 mV (n=8, P>0.05),  respectively.  In 14 BOM-sensitive neurons,  a ls-EPSP was elicited by repetitive colon nerve stimulation.  Superfusion of BOM (10 μmol/L) in these cells  initially   caused a large depolarization and then membrane potential gradually subsided to resting level in the continuous presence of BOM. Stimulation of the presynaptic nerves at this time failed to elicit a detecable ls-EPSP in 2 neurons and induced a much smaller one in 10 cells,  while the ls-EPSP in the remaining 2 neurons was not appreciably affected. On the other hand,  prolonged superfusion of BOM had no effect on the amplitude and duration of ls-EPSP in 6 BOM-insensititive neurons studied (P>0.05).  The amplitude and duration of SP-induced depolarization were not altered by prolonged superfusion of BOM (n=4, P>0.05). Superfusion of tyr4[D-phe12]bombesin (1 μmol/L,  10-15 min),  a BOM receptor antagonist,  did not cause any noticeable changes in passive membrane properties nor block nicotinic f-EPSPs,  but markedly supressed (n=5) or completely abolished (n=11) BOM depolarization in all 16 neurons tested. Similarly,  tyr4[D-phe12]bombesin partially or completely antagonized the ls-EPSP in 9 out of a total of BOM sensitive neurons (n=11).  The ls-EPSP elicited in the remaining two neurons was insignificantly affected by this drug.  However,  following 10-20 min of wash with Krebs solution the ls-EPSP was reversed.  In contrast,  superfusion of the ganglia with tyr4[D-phe12]bombesin did not change the amplitude and duration (P>0.05) of ls-EPSP in 10 BOM-insensitive cells. Similarly,  the amplitude and duration of SP-induced depolarization were not appreciably affected by tyr4[D-phe12]bombesin (n=6, P>0.05). In conclusion,  our results indicate that BOM may be another transmitter mediating the  ls-EPSP in the guinea pig IMG and that there is  no cross-desensitization of BOM receptors and SP receptors.

 

Key words: bombesin; substance P; late slow excitatory postsynaptic potential; inferior mesenteric

ganglion; guinea pig